| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Korean J Pancreas Biliary Tract > Volume 31(1):2026 > Article
de-Madaria, Guilabert, and Guilabert: Best Fluid Resuscitation Strategy in Acute Pancreatitis

Abstract

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a prevalent and potentially life-threatening condition with rising global incidence and substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Early management centers on supportive care, with fluid resuscitation being a pivotal intervention during the acute phase. However, recent evidence has questioned the efficacy of aggressive fluid administration, previously thought to improve outcomes by mitigating hypovolemia and complications. This review synthesizes current data regarding fluid resuscitation strategies in AP, emphasizing the variability in individual fluid needs, the central roles of endothelial and glycocalyx integrity, and the risks of both under- and over-hydration. Notably, findings from large randomized controlled trials, including the influential WATERFALL study, demonstrate that aggressive fluid resuscitation increases the incidence of fluid overload without improving clinical outcomes compared to moderate strategies. Subsequent meta-analyses and guideline updates now endorse a moderate fluid resuscitation approach, as reflected in the 2024 American College of Gastroenterology recommendations. The review concludes that while fluid therapy remains the cornerstone of early AP management, a shift toward tailored, moderate fluid administration is warranted to optimize outcomes and minimize harm. Continued research is essential to refine individualized resuscitation protocols, with particular attention to biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and fluid requirements.

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a very common disease. It is the second most common cause of admission among gastrointestinal diseases [1]. From 1990 to 2021, global pancreatitis cases increased from 1.73 million to 2.75 million, representing a rise of 59% [2]. Most cases occur in vulnerable people (alcohol consumption, low economic status), involve hospitalization, and are often associated on the one hand with significant morbidity (patient suffering, prolonged hospital stays, need for invasive treatments, and high hospital costs) and on the other hand with risk of mortality [1,3]. The total healthcare cost of AP in the Department of Health of Alicante - General Hospital in 2018 was 880,110 euros (almost 1 million euros for one hospital only) [4].

DETERMINANTS OF FLUID RESUSCITATION

1. Severity of acute pancreatitis

According to the Revised Atlanta Classification (a standard that defines complications and severity of AP), severity is categorized into three levels: mild (absence of complications), moderately severe (presence of local complications, transient-lasting up to 48 hours-organ failure or exacerbation of previous co-morbidity), and severe (presence of persistent-lasting more than 48 hours-organ failure) [5]. Based on a prospective multicenter study carried out by our group at a national level, pancreatitis is mild in 65% of cases, with an excellent prognosis. In 28% it is moderately severe, with notable morbidity but low mortality, and in 7% of cases it is severe with a 50% mortality rate [3].
Pancreatitis is an inflammatory disease with an acute onset. An intense inflammation inadequately controlled by the immune system can lead to local complications (peripancreatic fluid collections, necrosis of the pancreatic gland and/or the fatty tissue surrounding it) and organ failure (cardiovascular, renal and/or respiratory) [5,6]. In the context of a common acute disease that can cause both local and systemic complications, it would be ideal to have a treatment capable of controlling the initial inflammatory process, and altering its natural course. However, we currently lack available drugs that achieve this. Presently, the management of AP in its initial phase relies on supportive treatment, which primarily includes fluid therapy, pain relief, monitoring for early signs of organ failure, and, in some patients, nutritional support [7]. Notably, fluid therapy has been emphasized in the early phase of pancreatitis for nearly thirty years [8]. The pancreas secretes inactive digestive enzymes (zymogens) that are activated in the intestine to initiate the digestive process. An intrapancreatic enzymatic activation can initiate acinar cell damage that triggers a complex inflammatory cascade, in which different proinflammatory mediators recruit immune system cells to the pancreas [9]. The release of intracellular molecules and elements (Damage Associated Molecular Patterns, DAMPs), such as histones, by acinar cell necrosis also contributes to the stimulation of the immune system [9]. A controlled inflammatory response results in mild AP, without complications and with an uneventful disease course. However, extensive phenomena of cellular necrosis and local inflammation are associated with local complications. The massive release of DAMPs results in a significant proinflammatory reaction of the immune system which may be associated with systemic manifestations (systemic inflammatory response syndrome) [9]. If this intense inflammation is not adequately controlled, organ failure (renal, respiratory, cardiovascular/ distributive shock) or a combination of these may be triggered. Organ failure is the most feared complication, because it is associated with increased mortality, especially multi-organ failure or failure lasting more than 48 hours (both associated with a 50% mortality rate) [3].

2. The complexity of fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis and the need for new studies

In an observational study conducted by our group and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston (USA), we found that each patient with AP has different fluid requirements in the initial days of the disease. These requirements can fluctuate between a neutral balance (no extra requirements) and the need for several liters of fluid resuscitation each day due to a significant positive fluid balance caused by the retention of large amounts of administered fluids in the body (fluid sequestration) [10]. The severity of the disease, along with the development of local complications and organ failure, were major determinants of fluid sequestration. Thus, in general, cases of mild AP do not have increased fluid requirements, but moderately severe to severe AP carries a high risk of hypovolemia. Hypovolemia is a condition characterized by a decreased volume of blood circulating in the body, which can lead to inadequate tissue perfusion and organ dysfunction: renal failure and shock. In addition, if an excessive volume of fluids is administered, we can cause fluid overload, which can lead to respiratory failure due to acute pulmonary edema and cardiovascular failure. As we mentioned before, organ failure is the most feared complication of AP due to its strong association with mortality. A lack or excess of fluid volume can harm the patient. There would be an ideal balance in which the fluid administration strategy would be efficient in treating hypovolemia, but without tending towards the excessive overload that is associated with cardiac and pulmonary complications. Unfortunately, we do not have precise means of calculating the fluid deficit that patients have. Therefore, on the one hand, we must look for efficient fluid administration strategies, and on the other hand, new markers of fluid needs that allow for personalized medicine.

3. The endothelium and the glycocalyx in acute inflammatory diseases and acute pancreatitis

The endothelium is a layer of endothelial cells that lines the internal surface of blood vessels, acting as a barrier between blood and tissue [11]. This semi-permeable barrier exchanges plasma, nutrients, and metabolites between the organs and the blood [11]. The glycocalyx is a protective carbohydrate-rich layer covering the endothelium’s luminal surface. It is composed mainly of membrane-bound proteoglycans (such as syndecans and glypicans), glycosaminoglycans (such as heparan sulfate, chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronan) and glycoproteins (cell adhesion molecules and components of the coagulation and fibrinolysis systems) [11]. The glycocalyx plays several key roles in vascular homeostasis: it regulates the response of the endothelium to changes in blood flow, it acts as a barrier to prevent inappropriate activation of coagulation, it participates in the interaction between endothelial cells and circulating mediators and limits the passage of fluids and proteins from the blood to the tissues [11-14]. Under physiological conditions, the endothelial glycocalyx undergoes continuous turnover. However, numerous pathological conditions such as acute diseases, inflammation, shock, aggressive fluid resuscitation and hypoperfusion have been linked to its deterioration. The process is marked by the release of its components into the bloodstream, ultimately leading to endothelial dysfunction [14]. Consequently, this damage may contribute to the development of capillary leak syndrome [15] and activation of coagulation [11]. Capillary leak syndrome is a pathological condition observed in acute inflammatory diseases like AP, characterized by increased vascular permeability, leading to fluid and protein extravasation into the interstitial space, resulting in hypovolemia, edema, and potential organ dysfunction. Microcirculatory changes in the pancreas may induce necrosis of the gland [16], so we can hypothesize that endothelial dysfunction may be involved in local complications in AP [15]. Importantly, different components of the glycocalyx, such as shed proteoglycan ectodomains, hyaluronan fragments and free heparan sulfate chains, function as DAMPs, which when released into the circulation, exacerbate endothelial dysfunction, trigger inflammatory cascades, and contribute to microvascular injury thereby compromising the effectiveness of interventions such as intravenous fluid resuscitation [17] For all these reasons, the endothelium and the glycocalyx appear to be key elements in the intravenous fluid requirements of patients with AP. Their integrity could improve the prognosis, and markers associated with their dysfunction could help us detect those patients who require a greater volume of fluids or who are at risk of pancreatic necrosis.

FLUID RESUSCITATION STRATEGIES IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS

The optimal volume of fluids to be administered in the early phase of AP has been a controversial issue in recent decades [18,19]. Observational studies [8,20,21] and a randomized controlled trial [22] suggested that aggressive fluid resuscitation could improve the clinical course of the disease. In a prospective study by our group, published in 2011, we described that a more aggressive fluid resuscitation was harmful for patients with AP [23]. In two other observational studies of our group, we also did not find a better clinical course of AP in those patients who received more fluid volume in the earliest phase of AP: while the patient was in the emergency department [24,25]. Furthermore, two clinical trials focusing on patients with severe AP admitted to the intensive care unit, demonstrated that more aggressive fluid resuscitation was associated with increased mortality [26,27]. In 2022, our group published in the prestigious journal “The New England Journal of Medicine” the WATERFALL study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) in which we compared lactated Ringer solution-based aggressive fluid resuscitation (bolus of 20 mL/kg of weight followed by an infusion of 3 mL/kg/h) versus moderate fluid resuscitation (infusion of 1.5 mL/kg/h, preceded by a bolus of 10 mL/kg only in case of hypovolemia) [28]. In the first interim analysis (249 patients), we described that aggressive fluid resuscitation was associated with a fluid overload rate of 21% versus 6% in the moderate group (p<0.05) without a better clinical course of the disease in patients under aggressive fluid resuscitation. These findings led to a change in clinical practice. The editorial in The New England Journal of Medicine that accompanied our study emphasized that “the trial is so clinically relevant because of its choice of real-world–appropriate aggressive-resuscitation and moderate-resuscitation treatment groups, its use of pancreatitis severity as the main clinical outcome, and its reliance on the carefully defined variable of fluid overload as the main safety outcome.” [29] Subsequent meta-analyses supported our results [30-32], and moderate fluid therapy has been recommended since 2024 in the American College of Gastroenterology’s AP management guidelines, citing the WATERFALL trial [33].

CONCLUSION

The management of AP remains a challenge due to the variability in disease severity and the lack of pharmacological treatments capable of altering its natural course. Fluid resuscitation is a cornerstone of early AP management, but its optimal strategy is still debated. Recent studies, including the WATERFALL trial, have demonstrated that aggressive fluid resuscitation increases the risk of fluid overload without improving clinical outcomes. As a result, a moderate fluid resuscitation approach has been recommended since 2024 in the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: EdM; Methodology: EdM; Project administration: EdM; Supervision: EdM; Writing–original draft: all authors; Writing–review & editing: all authors.

REFERENCES

1. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022;162:621-644.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Li T, Qin C, Zhao B, et al. Global and regional burden of pancreatitis: epidemiological trends, risk factors, and projections to 2050 from the global burden of disease study 2021. BMC Gastroenterol 2024;24:398.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Sternby H, Bolado F, Canaval-Zuleta HJ, et al. Determinants of severity in acute pancreatitis: a nation-wide multicenter prospective cohort study. Ann Surg 2019;270:348-355.
pmid
4. Ferrer Grau Raul. Pancreatitis aguda: consumo de recursos en un hospital de tercer nivel [Internet]. Universidad Miguel Hernández; 2023 [cited 2025 Nov. 15]. Available from: https://dspace.umh.es/handle/11000/29277.

5. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102-111.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Wiley MB, Mehrotra K, Bauer J, Yazici C, Bialkowska AB, Jung B. Acute pancreatitis: current clinical approaches, molecular pathophysiology, and potential therapeutics. Pancreas 2023;52:e335-e343.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Guilabert L, Cárdenas-Jaén K, de-Madaria E. Initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2025;54:21-36.
crossref pmid
8. Baillargeon JD, Orav J, Ramagopal V, Tenner SM, Banks PA. Hemoconcentration as an early risk factor for necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:2130-2134.
crossref pmid
9. Barreto SG, Habtezion A, Gukovskaya A, et al. Critical thresholds: key to unlocking the door to the prevention and specific treatments for acute pancreatitis. Gut 2021;70:194-203.
crossref pmid pmc
10. de-Madaria E, Banks PA, Moya-Hoyo N, et al. Early factors associated with fluid sequestration and outcomes of patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:997-1002.
crossref pmid
11. Juffermans NP, van den Brom CE, Kleinveld DJB. Targeting endothelial dysfunction in acute critical illness to reduce organ failure. Anesth Analg 2020;131:1708-1720.
crossref pmid
12. Reitsma S, Slaaf DW, Vink H, van Zandvoort MA, oude Egbrink MG. The endothelial glycocalyx: composition, functions, and visualization. Pflugers Arch 2007;454:345-359.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Yang Y, Schmidt EP. The endothelial glycocalyx: an important regulator of the pulmonary vascular barrier. Tissue Barriers 2013;1:e23494.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation fluids. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1243-1251.
crossref pmid
15. Whitcomb DC, Muddana V, Langmead CJ, et al. Angiopoietin-2, a regulator of vascular permeability in inflammation, is associated with persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis from the United States and Germany. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2287-2292.
crossref pmid pdf
16. Cuthbertson CM, Christophi C. Disturbances of the microcirculation in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2006;93:518-530.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Johnson GB, Brunn GJ, Kodaira Y, Platt JL. Receptor-mediated monitoring of tissue well-being via detection of soluble heparan sulfate by Toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol 2002;168:5233-5239.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Fisher JM, Gardner TB. The “golden hours” of management in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:1146-1150.
crossref pmid pdf
19. de-Madaria E, Garg PK. Fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis - aggressive or adequate? Time for reappraisal. Pancreatology 2014;14:433-435.
crossref pmid
20. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Conwell DL, Banks PA. Early changes in blood urea nitrogen predict mortality in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2009;137:129-135.
crossref pmid
21. Warndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, et al. Early fluid resuscitation reduces morbidity among patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011;9:705-709.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Buxbaum JL, Quezada M, Da B, et al. Early aggressive hydration hastens clinical improvement in mild acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:797-803.
crossref pmid
23. de-Madaria E, Soler-Sala G, Sánchez-Payá J, et al. Influence of fluid therapy on the prognosis of acute pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:1843-1850.
crossref pmid pdf
24. Singh VK, Gardner TB, Papachristou GI, et al. An international multicenter study of early intravenous fluid administration and outcome in acute pancreatitis. United European Gastroenterol J 2017;5:491-498.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
25. Guilabert L, Buxbaum JL, García García De Paredes A, et al. Impact of fluid therapy in the emergency department in acute pancreatitis: a post hoc analysis of the WATERFALL trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2025;23:2042-2044.e3.
pmid
26. Mao EQ, Tang YQ, Fei J, et al. Fluid therapy for severe acute pancreatitis in acute response stage. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009;122:169-173.
crossref pmid
27. Mao EQ, Fei J, Peng YB, Huang J, Tang YQ, Zhang SD. Rapid hemodilution is associated with increased sepsis and mortality among patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:1639-1644.
crossref pmid
28. de-Madaria E, Buxbaum JL, Maisonneuve P, et al. Aggressive or moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2022;387:989-1000.
crossref pmid
29. Gardner TB. Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis - going over the WATERFALL. N Engl J Med 2022;387:1038-1039.
crossref pmid
30. Li XW, Wang CH, Dai JW, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between aggressive and non-aggressive intravenous hydration for acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2023;27:122.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
31. Ding X, Chen B. Effect of aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation versus nonaggressive fluid resuscitation in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas 2023;52:e89-e100.
crossref pmid
32. Dawson A, Karunakaran M, Sharma ZD, Ullah S, Barreto SG. Fluid resuscitation in the early management of acute pancreatitis - evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2023;25:1451-1465.
crossref pmid
33. Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119:419-437.
crossref pmid
Editorial Office
Korean Pancreatobiliary Association #723 Le Meilleur Jongro Town, Jongro19, Jongro-gu, Seoul 03157, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2285-5145 Fax: +82-2-2285-5146   E-mail: ercp@kams.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Pancreatobiliary Association.     Developed in M2PI