| 총담관 결석의 내시경적 제거술 후 내시경적 경비담관 배액술의 유용성 |
| 김순선, 황재철, 임선교, 이다미, 최재명, 류경호, 유병무, 김진홍 |
| 아주대학교 의과대학 소화기내과학교실
|
| Usability of Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage after Endoscopic Removal of Common Bile Duct Stones |
| Soon Sun Kim, Jae Chul Hwang, Sun-Gyo Lim, Dami Lee, Jae Myoung Choi, Kyoung-Ho Ryu, Byung Moo Yoo, Jin Hong Kim |
| Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
Background/Aims: We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) group and non-ENBD group after endoscopic common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction. Methods: From March 2003 to August 2008, a total of 532 patients (282 men; mean age 62.4 years) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD stone extraction. Results: Among 532 patients, CBD stones were completely extracted in 523 patients (98.3%). Among 523 patients, CBD stone were completely extracted by 1st ERCP attempt in 507 patients (96.9%). ENBD-1 group comprised of 28 patients who received ENBD with any indication. ENBD-2 group comprised of 9 patients who received ENBD routinely after complete CBD stone removal. There was no significant difference in occurrence of post ERCP cholangitis or residual CBD stone between ENBD-1 group (n=28) and Non-ENBD-1 group (n=504) (3.6% vs. 2.2%, 3.6% vs. 0.6%, P=0.48 and P=0.08, respectively), and between ENBD-2 group (n=9) and Non-ENBD-2 group (n=500) (0.0% vs. 2.2%, 0.0% vs. 0.8%, P=1.00 and P=1.00, respectively). Conclusions: Post ERCP cholangitis and residual CBD stone occurred rarely after CBD stone extraction. Therefore routine insertion of ENBD for biliary decompression after CBD stone extraction should be considered prudently. |
| Keywords:
CBD stone, ENBD, Cholangitis, Residual CBD stone |
|